capaDATA
  • PERFORMANCE
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 5-year annualised returns
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 3-year annualised returns
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 1-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 5-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 3-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 1-year annualised returns
  • RISK/RETURN
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 5-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 3-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 1-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 5-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 3-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 1-year annualised
  • PROVIDERS
    • Aegon Master Trust
    • Aon Master Trust
    • Atlas Master Trust
    • Aviva Master Trust
    • The Bluesky Pension Scheme
    • Ensign Retirement Plan
    • Fidelity Master Trust
    • Legal & General Investment Management – WorkSave Pension Mastertrust
    • LifeSight (Willis Towers Watson)
    • Mercer Master Trust
    • National Employment Savings Trust (NEST)
    • Now: Pensions
    • The People’s Pension
    • Salvus Master Trust
    • Scottish Widows Master Trust
    • Smart Pension
    • Standard Life DC Master Trust
    • SuperTrust UK Master Trust
    • TPT Retirement Solutions
    • Welplan Pensions
  • Research
    • ADVISERS
      • Pension provider selection factors
      • Switching
      • Diversification
      • Illiquids
      • ESG
      • Green
      • Digital
      • Consolidation
    • PROVIDERS
      • Master Trusts by number of members
      • Master Trust defaults by assets and number of employers
      • Member charges
      • Employer charges
      • Master trust investment advisers
      • Equity exposure
      • Derisking
      • Asset managers used
  • NEWS
  • MORE
    • About
    • Advertise
    • Contact us
    • Privacy policy
    • Content syndication
    • Terms & Conditions
CAPA
No Result
View All Result

‘£100bn wiped off gilts’ as RPI dumped

25 November 2020
Sunak work and pensions package welcomed by industry
Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedIn

£100bn has been wiped off the value of index linked gilts and other RPI-linked assets by the Chancellor’s decision to dump the retail price index in favour of CPIH, says Hymans Robertson.

Announcing the outcome of the consultation of the reform to RPI methodology alongside Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s Spending Review today, the Treasury has confirmed that CPIH will replace RPI by 2030, as had been largely expected.

Millions of defined benefit pension scheme members are expected to receive lower indexation increases in future as a result of the switch.

But schemes will potentially see their liabilities reduced as a result of the switch. The Society of Pension Consultants says it is unclear whether the change will be net positive or negative for scheme funding.

Matt Davis, Partner, Hymans Robertson, says: “If RPI is aligned with CPIH from 2030 this will be a major blow both for pension schemes and their members.

“Pension schemes that have followed regulatory and industry best practice by hedging the inflation risk inherit in providing pensions are major holders of index linked gilts and other RPI-linked assets.  This change means RPI-linked assets are expected to increase at a lower rate than previously anticipated, which makes them less valuable than before.  The schemes that will be worst affected are likely to be those with high levels of inflation hedging and a high proportion of CPI-linked pension increases.  In some cases these schemes could see a 10 per cent fall in funding level.  The Government has stated it will not offer compensation to holders of index-linked gilts which will have a huge detrimental impact.

“We expected this to have a very significant effect on investors as a whole.  We estimate that the impact on the totality of index-linked gilt holders will be a loss in the region of £100bn based on past differences between RPI and CPIH.  Given the vast sums of money involved we expect to see continued pressure on the Government to review its decision not to compensate those due to lose out.”

Society of Pension Professionals president James Riley says: “The outcome of the consultation is largely as expected bringing RPI in line with CPIH by 2030. This removes one of the many uncertainties hanging over pension schemes currently and, at one level, this certainty is helpful.

“However, it’s yet another lottery, alongside others including GMP equalisation, that affects otherwise similar schemes and sponsors differently. Schemes’ RPI assets such as index-linked gilts and inflation swaps will be adversely impacted. Will the reduction in the scheme’s liabilities be greater? And then of course, there are pension scheme members, many of whom, rightly or wrongly, will receive lower pension increases than they might otherwise have expected.”

Derry Pickford, principal consultant in the asset allocation team at Aon, says: “This is as widely expected and we believe that markets will not be surprised by this, although there is a small amount of relief that there won’t be an earlier change than February 2030 – as shown by the bounce back in the five year forward RPI inflation swap. However, the need to be prepared for changes in 2030 has been confirmed.”

 

 

The post ‘£100bn wiped off gilts’ as RPI dumped appeared first on Corporate Adviser.

TweetShareShare
Previous Post

Smart Pension appoints new MD

Next Post

Steven Cameron: Why transfer values will fall under CPIH

Category

  • By Provider
  • News
  • Not for search
  • Provider page archive
  • Uncategorized
  • video
CAPA data

© 2019-2024 Definite Article Media Limited. Design by 71 Media Limited.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication

Follow us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptReject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication