capaDATA
  • PERFORMANCE
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 5-year annualised returns
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 3-year annualised returns
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 1-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 5-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 3-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 1-year annualised returns
  • RISK/RETURN
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 5-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 3-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 1-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 5-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 3-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 1-year annualised
  • PROVIDERS
    • Aegon Master Trust
    • Aon Master Trust
    • Atlas Master Trust
    • Aviva Master Trust
    • The Bluesky Pension Scheme
    • Ensign Retirement Plan
    • Fidelity Master Trust
    • Legal & General Investment Management – WorkSave Pension Mastertrust
    • LifeSight (Willis Towers Watson)
    • Mercer Master Trust
    • National Employment Savings Trust (NEST)
    • Now: Pensions
    • The People’s Pension
    • Salvus Master Trust
    • Scottish Widows Master Trust
    • Smart Pension
    • Standard Life DC Master Trust
    • SuperTrust UK Master Trust
    • TPT Retirement Solutions
    • Welplan Pensions
  • Research
    • ADVISERS
      • Pension provider selection factors
      • Switching
      • Diversification
      • Illiquids
      • ESG
      • Green
      • Digital
      • Consolidation
    • PROVIDERS
      • Master Trusts by number of members
      • Master Trust defaults by assets and number of employers
      • Member charges
      • Employer charges
      • Master trust investment advisers
      • Equity exposure
      • Derisking
      • Asset managers used
  • NEWS
  • MORE
    • About
    • Advertise
    • Contact us
    • Privacy policy
    • Content syndication
    • Terms & Conditions
CAPA
No Result
View All Result

Budget 2024: Chancellor Hunt proposes 2p NIC cut, no income tax changes

06 March 2024
Key decisions facing Chancellor ahead of Autumn Statement: AJ Bell
Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedIn

Chancellor Hunt has announced a 2 per cent cut in National Insurance Contributions (NIC), reducing the rate from 10 per cent to 8 per cent starting from April 6th, with self-employed NIC cut from 8 per cent to 6 per cent.

The proposed cut offers the government cost advantages compared to reducing income tax, as a 2p cut from income tax would cost £14bn. In comparison, a 2p reduction in National Insurance would cost £9bn.

In his Budget speech, Hunt stated that the NIC cuts would mean an additional £450 annually for the average employee and £350 for someone self-employed. With the Autumn reductions factored in, 27 million employees would experience an average take-home pay increase of £900 a year, while 2 million self-employed individuals would see a tax cut averaging £650.

He highlighted that these changes aim to simplify the system, promote fairness, and stimulate economic growth by rewarding work. Additionally, Hunt mentioned that the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) predicts that, when combined with the Autumn reduction, the NIC cuts would lead to the equivalent of 200,000 more people in work, filling one in five vacancies, and adding 0.4 per cent to GDP and 0.4 per cent of GDP per capita.

He said: “This is the second fiscal event where we’ve reduced employee and self-employed National Insurance we’ve cut it by 1/3 in 6 months without increasing borrowing and without cutting spending on public services which means the average earner in the UK now has the lowest effective personal tax rate since 1975. Their effective taxes are now lower than in America France Germany or any G7 country because Conservatives believe that making work pay is of the most fundamental importance because we believe that the double taxation of work is unfair.

“Our long-term ambition is to end this unfairness when it is responsible when it can be achieved without increasing borrowing when it can be delivered without compromising high-quality public services we will continue to cut national insurance as we have done today so we truly make work pay.”

Meanwhile, the pension industry is warning that the cuts could undermine employee savings and pensions. Its benefits are limited as it applies only to earned income, excluding pensions, savings, and investments like property and so many voters would not benefit from this tax cut.

Hargreaves Lansdown head of personal finance Sarah Coles says: “The move also suffers from the fact that National Insurance was cut in January – so this simply offers more of the same. It’s also clear that it’s not a widely understood tax, so people may not appreciate the impact on their income – and may worry that it could affect their state pension entitlement.”

Hymans Robertson cautions that proposed cuts to National Insurance Contributions (NIC) may erode employee savings and pension contributions. Despite increasing take-home pay, reductions in NIC directly oppose efforts to bolster workplace pensions. Calculations reveal that for every £100 sacrificed into a pension by basic rate taxpayers, costs to employees rise incrementally with NIC cuts. Employers could save £13.80 on pay sacrificed for pensions. Hymans Robertson urges employers to consider directing NIC savings into employees’ pension funds to mitigate adverse effects and ensure long-term financial security.

Hymans Robertson partner Susan Waites says: “A cut in employee National Insurance Contributions (NIC) would further erode the savings an employee makes by sacrificing pay for pension contributions versus the savings their employer makes. Although the increase in take home pay would outweigh the increase in the cost of pension contributions, this is still cuts across Government intentions and industry efforts to incentivise employees to pay much more into their workplace pensions.”

“Some employers choose to pay some or all of their NIC saving into the employee’s pension. We would encourage those that don’t to consider doing that if NIC is cut again.”

The post Budget 2024: Chancellor Hunt proposes 2p NIC cut, no income tax changes appeared first on Corporate Adviser.

TweetShareShare
Previous Post

Budget ’24: Hunt orders scheme to disclose UK holdings and threatens action to increase domestic investment

Next Post

Budget ’24: Industry concerned as Hunt presses ahead with ‘pot for life’ reforms

Category

  • By Provider
  • News
  • Not for search
  • Provider page archive
  • Uncategorized
  • video
CAPA data

© 2019-2024 Definite Article Media Limited. Design by 71 Media Limited.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication

Follow us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptReject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication