capaDATA
  • PERFORMANCE
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 5-year annualised returns
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 3-year annualised returns
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 1-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 5-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 3-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 1-year annualised returns
  • RISK/RETURN
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 5-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 3-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 1-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 5-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 3-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 1-year annualised
  • PROVIDERS
    • Aegon Master Trust
    • Aon Master Trust
    • Atlas Master Trust
    • Aviva Master Trust
    • The Bluesky Pension Scheme
    • Ensign Retirement Plan
    • Fidelity Master Trust
    • Legal & General Investment Management – WorkSave Pension Mastertrust
    • LifeSight (Willis Towers Watson)
    • Mercer Master Trust
    • National Employment Savings Trust (NEST)
    • Now: Pensions
    • The People’s Pension
    • Salvus Master Trust
    • Scottish Widows Master Trust
    • Smart Pension
    • Standard Life DC Master Trust
    • SuperTrust UK Master Trust
    • TPT Retirement Solutions
    • Welplan Pensions
  • Research
    • ADVISERS
      • Pension provider selection factors
      • Switching
      • Diversification
      • Illiquids
      • ESG
      • Green
      • Digital
      • Consolidation
    • PROVIDERS
      • Master Trusts by number of members
      • Master Trust defaults by assets and number of employers
      • Member charges
      • Employer charges
      • Master trust investment advisers
      • Equity exposure
      • Derisking
      • Asset managers used
  • NEWS
  • MORE
    • About
    • Advertise
    • Contact us
    • Privacy policy
    • Content syndication
    • Terms & Conditions
CAPA
No Result
View All Result

Ditching RPI ‘would wipe 0.8pc off indexation’

24 November 2020
Sunak work and pensions package welcomed by industry
Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedIn

Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s rumoured plan to ditch Retail Prices Index (RPI) inflation measure in tomorrow’s spending review could wipe around 0.8 per cent a year off payment increases.

The Chancellor is rumoured to be planning to phase out RPI between 2025 and 2030, and replace it with the alternative Consumer Prices Index measure (CPIH).

Previous estimates from the Association of British Insurers published this year said this could wipe £122bn from the value of pensions and investments.

Investors in index-linked gilts, defined benefit pension (DB) scheme members and annuity holders could be among those hit if RPI is abolished; while those with student loans and rail passengers stand to benefit.

AJ Bell senior analyst Tom Selby says: “Proposals to abolish the RPI inflation measure have barely created a ripple in 2020 but risk causing colossal damage to people’s pensions and investments. This is because, as things stand, RPI-linked increases are written into millions of financial services contracts.

“Annuities have also been sold on the promise of RPI protection, while index-linked gilts, which are held by huge numbers of investors either individually or via their pensions, are also pegged to RPI inflation.
“If these contracts are to effectively be torn up and RPI replaced with CPIH, millions of savers and investors stand to lose out as a result.

“Because CPIH tends to be around 0.8 percentage point lower than RPI, over time investments or pension incomes linked to CPIH will grow more slowly than they would if they were linked to RPI.

“The key question now is whether the Chancellor will provide any sort of easement to protect existing contracts. One option would be for the ONS to keep publishing RPI so companies can continue to honour contracts written prior to the change.”

Ditching RPI could be good news for some young people and commuters, however. The Government has doggedly, and some would say cynically, continued to link things like rail fare increases and student loan repayments to RPI, ensuring a quiet and creeping boost to Treasury coffers.
Conversely, the state pension, benefit payments and tax thresholds have been linked to the lower CPI measure, leading to accusations of ‘index shopping’ by successive administrations.

How swapping RPI with CPIH could affect someone with a £20,000 a year pension

The impact of linking people’s retirement incomes to a lower inflation measure will be felt over the course of decades.

For someone with a £20,000 annual pension which is linked to RPI, over the course of a 30-year retirement, if RPI rose by 2.8 per cent a year they would have received a total income of £947,000.

However, if instead it rose in line with CPIH at 2 per cent, over the same 30-year retirement they would receive total income of roughly £828,000.

This means a simple switch from RPI to CPIH could cost someone in this position £119,000 in lost retirement income.”

 

The post Ditching RPI ‘would wipe 0.8pc off indexation’ appeared first on Corporate Adviser.

TweetShareShare
Previous Post

Speculation of Govt tax raid on pensions surfaces again

Next Post

Smart Pension appoints new MD

Category

  • By Provider
  • News
  • Not for search
  • Provider page archive
  • Uncategorized
  • video
CAPA data

© 2019-2024 Definite Article Media Limited. Design by 71 Media Limited.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication

Follow us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptReject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication