capaDATA
  • PERFORMANCE
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 5-year annualised returns
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 3-year annualised returns
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 1-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 5-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 3-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 1-year annualised returns
  • RISK/RETURN
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 5-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 3-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 1-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 5-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 3-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 1-year annualised
  • PROVIDERS
    • Aegon Master Trust
    • Aon Master Trust
    • Atlas Master Trust
    • Aviva Master Trust
    • The Bluesky Pension Scheme
    • Ensign Retirement Plan
    • Fidelity Master Trust
    • Legal & General Investment Management – WorkSave Pension Mastertrust
    • LifeSight (Willis Towers Watson)
    • Mercer Master Trust
    • National Employment Savings Trust (NEST)
    • Now: Pensions
    • The People’s Pension
    • Salvus Master Trust
    • Scottish Widows Master Trust
    • Smart Pension
    • Standard Life DC Master Trust
    • SuperTrust UK Master Trust
    • TPT Retirement Solutions
    • Welplan Pensions
  • Research
    • ADVISERS
      • Pension provider selection factors
      • Switching
      • Diversification
      • Illiquids
      • ESG
      • Green
      • Digital
      • Consolidation
    • PROVIDERS
      • Master Trusts by number of members
      • Master Trust defaults by assets and number of employers
      • Member charges
      • Employer charges
      • Master trust investment advisers
      • Equity exposure
      • Derisking
      • Asset managers used
  • NEWS
  • MORE
    • About
    • Advertise
    • Contact us
    • Privacy policy
    • Content syndication
    • Terms & Conditions
CAPA
No Result
View All Result

‘Flawed’ investment pathways could lead to misselling: AJ Bell

13 October 2020
TPR launches consultation on new DB funding code
Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedIn

AJ Bell CEO Andy Bell has written to the newly appointed FCA chief executive warning proposed investment pathways could potential create a new misselling scandal. 

In the letter Bell highlights the “consumer dangers” in the proposed pathways, stating they are “fundamentally flawed” and “will not deliver the customer outcomes the regulator has set out to achieve”. 

He warns they are “a mandate or providers to sell expensive in-house funds” and “will have ambulance-chasing lawyers salivating”.

The letter is addressed to new FCA head Nikhil Rathi, who was appointed in June. Plans to introduce these retirement pathways — which propose a series of ready-made investment options for those entering drawdown without advice —  were postponed from August this year to Feb 2021, following the coronavirus pandemic. 

Bell adds: “ The FCA clearly has its hands full dealing with Covid-19 and I derive no pleasure from taking pot shots at an already overburdened regulator.

“However, where I see an intervention that so obviously risks causing real and lasting consumer harm I cannot simply stand quietly by and watch it happen, even though investment pathways are commercially attractive to firms like AJ Bell.”

He adds: “Investment pathways risk funnelling people into investments that do not suit their needs or retirement priorities and are a mandate for pension providers to line their pockets by peddling their own in-house funds with little or no control on fund charges.

“Furthermore if, in the words of Warren Buffet, diversification is a great protection against ignorance, why on earth is the FCA mandating pension providers shepherd non-advised drawdown customers into a single investment solution based on the answer to one ambiguous multiple-choice question?

“The regulator appears to be conducting a huge experiment with thousands of drawdown investors without ever properly testing whether it will actually work in the way it intends.”

He points out that if  investment pathways had been in place before the Covid-19 markets dip hit in March and April, providers would have faced a barrage of complaints from understandably angry customers who had lost money after it was suggested they put all their money in a single investment that subsequently fell by 10 to 15 per cent. 

Bell says: “The already uncertain lines between advice and guidance will become even more blurred and these customers will feel and claim they have been advised, when they haven’t.”

Bell says that as a provider, one of the challenges is that the FCA has prescribed every step of the investment pathways process “to the nth degree of detail” instead of adopting a principles-based approach.

He points out that the pension industry has to make these rules work with existing drawdown processes that vary significantly across the industry.   That increases the cost to the industry and ultimately to customers.

“I was pleased the FCA saw fit to delay the introduction of investment pathways until 2021 as a result of Covid-19. 

“The regulator now needs to re-engage with the industry to understand just how wide of the mark its initiative is from its target. Mr Rathi has the opportunity to refocus the FCA’s energies on solving the very real problems identified in the FCA’s Retirement Outcomes Review with targeted and proportionate measures in favour of the wrecking ball called Investment Pathways.”

Under proposed rules, people who enter drawdown or transfer funds to a new drawdown account will need to be offered ready-made ‘investment pathways’ based on their answers to basic questions about how they plan to spend their retirement pot.

Pathways will also need to be offered to non-advised drawdown customers each time they make a subsequent investment decision.

The four investment objectives stipulated by the FCA for investment pathways are:

  • Option 1: I have no plans to touch my money in the next 5 years
  • Option 2: I plan to use my money to set up a guaranteed income (annuity) within the next 5 years
  • Option 3: I plan to start taking my money as a long-term income within the next 5 years
  • Option 4: I plan to take out all my money within the next 5 years

 

 

The post ‘Flawed’ investment pathways could lead to misselling: AJ Bell appeared first on Corporate Adviser.

TweetShareShare
Previous Post

Larger SMEs failing to promote wellbeing services

Next Post

PLSA proposes new ‘at-retirement’ regulations

Category

  • By Provider
  • News
  • Not for search
  • Provider page archive
  • Uncategorized
  • video
CAPA data

© 2019-2024 Definite Article Media Limited. Design by 71 Media Limited.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication

Follow us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptReject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication