capaDATA
  • PERFORMANCE
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 5-year annualised returns
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 3-year annualised returns
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 1-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 5-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 3-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 1-year annualised returns
  • RISK/RETURN
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 5-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 3-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 1-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 5-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 3-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 1-year annualised
  • PROVIDERS
    • Aegon Master Trust
    • Aon Master Trust
    • Atlas Master Trust
    • Aviva Master Trust
    • The Bluesky Pension Scheme
    • Ensign Retirement Plan
    • Fidelity Master Trust
    • Legal & General Investment Management – WorkSave Pension Mastertrust
    • LifeSight (Willis Towers Watson)
    • Mercer Master Trust
    • National Employment Savings Trust (NEST)
    • Now: Pensions
    • The People’s Pension
    • Salvus Master Trust
    • Scottish Widows Master Trust
    • Smart Pension
    • Standard Life DC Master Trust
    • SuperTrust UK Master Trust
    • TPT Retirement Solutions
    • Welplan Pensions
  • Research
    • ADVISERS
      • Pension provider selection factors
      • Switching
      • Diversification
      • Illiquids
      • ESG
      • Green
      • Digital
      • Consolidation
    • PROVIDERS
      • Master Trusts by number of members
      • Master Trust defaults by assets and number of employers
      • Member charges
      • Employer charges
      • Master trust investment advisers
      • Equity exposure
      • Derisking
      • Asset managers used
  • NEWS
  • MORE
    • About
    • Advertise
    • Contact us
    • Privacy policy
    • Content syndication
    • Terms & Conditions
CAPA
No Result
View All Result

Half of advisers may exit DB transfer market

07 September 2020
Half of advisers may exit DB transfer market
Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedIn

Almost half of those currently on DB transfers say they are unsure whether they will still be active in this market in a year’s time, according to new research.

More stringent regulation and the increased cost of personal indemnity insurance is expected to mean fewer high-quality impartial advisers will operate in this area, according to a research paper by Royal London and consultants LCP. 

It says this could have a serious impact on members who need access to advice, and is calling on schemes and regulators to address this issue.

LCP says there are concerns this could push those looking to access pension funds – particularly in times of financial stress – towards less scrupulous advisers. 

The research – conducted among more than 700 advisers – found that three quarters of those that had stopped advising on DB transfers cited PI costs as a key issue.

It also found that some advisers charging on a contingent basis were considering leaving the market when the FCA’s ban on this charging structure comes into force.

The report says that many advisers felt that FCA’s position on DB transfers was uncertain and some were fearful that a wholesale review of past cases was on the cards. As a result respondents said that giving DB transfer advice was now outside the ‘risk appetite’ of their firm.

The research paper said that in the past five years there has been a surge in the number of people looking to transfer their pension rights from a DB scheme to a DC arrangement. 

Between April 2015, when pension freedoms were introduced and September 2018 nearly a quarter of a million people took advice on a DB transfer.

One response to the challenges in sourcing affordable high quality advice has been for schemes to appoint one or more advice firms to offer advice to members.  In this model, the scheme will often pay a significant sum to an advice firm to set-up a process for advising members and will subsidise the advice costs to members.  The paper gives case studies of two pension schemes, that have gone down this route.

The paper calls for greater support for the advice market, including action to reform the system of PI insurance.  It is also encourages more schemes to offer ‘partial’ DB transfers as an alternative to the ‘all-or-nothing’ transfer option which many members currently face. 

 Royal London’s senior pensions development and technical manager Justin Corliss says:  “Deciding whether or not to transfer out of a DB pension is a huge decision, and members should be able to access affordable, impartial advice.  

“Unfortunately, the costs of obtaining PI cover and constant regulatory change have led many advisers to leave the market or to consider doing so.  Urgent action is needed to make sure that all members can access the expert advice that they need”.

LCP partner Steve Webb, partner adds: “Pension schemes have an important role to play in ensuring that members are fully informed about their options and can access high quality advice.  Growing numbers of schemes have chosen to appoint one or more advice firms to support members as well as subsidising the costs of advice.  Members benefit from the reassurance that the scheme has undertaken due diligence on the advice firms involved as well as from reduced advice costs where the scheme is making a contribution”.

The post Half of advisers may exit DB transfer market appeared first on Corporate Adviser.

TweetShareShare
Previous Post

Digital GP services drive demand for out-of-hours healthcare

Next Post

Almost half of employees worry about job security

Category

  • By Provider
  • News
  • Not for search
  • Provider page archive
  • Uncategorized
  • video
CAPA data

© 2019-2024 Definite Article Media Limited. Design by 71 Media Limited.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication

Follow us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptReject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication