capaDATA
  • PERFORMANCE
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 5-year annualised returns
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 3-year annualised returns
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 1-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 5-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 3-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 1-year annualised returns
  • RISK/RETURN
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 5-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 3-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 1-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 5-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 3-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 1-year annualised
  • PROVIDERS
    • Aegon Master Trust
    • Aon Master Trust
    • Atlas Master Trust
    • Aviva Master Trust
    • The Bluesky Pension Scheme
    • Ensign Retirement Plan
    • Fidelity Master Trust
    • Legal & General Investment Management – WorkSave Pension Mastertrust
    • LifeSight (Willis Towers Watson)
    • Mercer Master Trust
    • National Employment Savings Trust (NEST)
    • Now: Pensions
    • The People’s Pension
    • Salvus Master Trust
    • Scottish Widows Master Trust
    • Smart Pension
    • Standard Life DC Master Trust
    • SuperTrust UK Master Trust
    • TPT Retirement Solutions
    • Welplan Pensions
  • Research
    • ADVISERS
      • Pension provider selection factors
      • Switching
      • Diversification
      • Illiquids
      • ESG
      • Green
      • Digital
      • Consolidation
    • PROVIDERS
      • Master Trusts by number of members
      • Master Trust defaults by assets and number of employers
      • Member charges
      • Employer charges
      • Master trust investment advisers
      • Equity exposure
      • Derisking
      • Asset managers used
  • NEWS
  • MORE
    • About
    • Advertise
    • Contact us
    • Privacy policy
    • Content syndication
    • Terms & Conditions
CAPA
No Result
View All Result

Jamie Jenkins: We seem to be at a crossroads on retirement saving

25 May 2023
Jamie Jenkins: We seem to be at a crossroads on retirement saving
Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedIn

SPONSORED CONTENT

We spent much of the 2010s implementing automatic enrolment, adding millions of savers through workplace pensions. It was a huge success. Pension freedoms brought welcome flexibility for those nearing retirement, removing the singular focus on annuities. And the State Pension was significantly simplified.

However, policymaking since then has been at best rather piecemeal, with incremental changes here and there on disclosure requirements, some adjustments to start paving the way for illiquid investments and the usual ups and downs of tax allowances.

There is evidently consensus around certain areas, though:

Everyone agrees that saving 8 per cent of a band of earnings is unlikely to be sufficient to achieve the retirement pot most people will need when they reach retirement

Similarly, there is widespread agreement on the need for greater support for people making retirement decisions

On contributions, it’s great to see the recommendations of the 2017 automatic enrolment review finally making their way through parliament, albeit simply in an enabling capacity. Reducing the age of eligibility to 18 will help people start saving earlier, and removing the Lower Earnings Limit will significantly increase the amount being saved for people on lower pay. Arguably, these changes pave the way for a more strategic review of the savings levels.

No-one would suggest that we make changes to increase pension contributions significantly at this point. If anything, some people are having to cut back on savings or even dip into them just to get by, while the cost of living remains so high. But having a plan is crucial. Perhaps a plan that is conditional upon economic conditions being right before increases are made, but a plan that is executable when that time comes.

After all, the cost-of-living crisis today is perhaps instructive when considering what an under-saved retired population might look like in future. 

It’s also becoming increasingly clear that people need more support in making retirement decisions. ‘Pension Freedoms’ were brought in almost a decade ago and, despite some well-intentioned work around structured guidance sessions, few people are receiving any support or advice as they make what for some will be the most significant financial decisions of their lives.

The forthcoming review of the advice / guidance boundary provides an opportunity to put this right, to focus on how we can help people, rather than simply warn them of all the dangers they face. It would also be sensible to focus on how we can reduce costs for advisers, hopefully leading to more people being able to access advice at a cost more proportionate to their needs.

This year’s Corporate Adviser report on ‘Master Trust and GPP Defaults’ provides unique insight into the current market for workplace pensions, highlighting an additional consideration; investment performance. Returns have varied wildly in recent years, most recently during the economic turmoil over the course of 2022. By their very nature, returns are not guaranteed and will never be wholly predictable, but there is more we can do to help people understand how their money is invested and whether that is right for them based upon their personal circumstances.

Certainly, the near singular focus on charges, with workplace schemes often won or lost for a few basis points of difference, is somewhat overshadowed by the 100s or even 1000s of basis points of difference illustrated in the investment returns. If we are to be truly focused on member outcomes then we must focus on the areas which make the biggest difference.

For contract-based schemes – group personal pensions – the consumer duty will bring an increased focus on real member outcomes. This should sharpen the focus on the key issues: adequacy of contribution
levels, support in decision making and investment suitability.

With a more strategic focus on the right issues, we may yet avoid the worst of the looming cost-of-living crisis in retirement.

We may even be able to make retirement something for everyone to look forward to. As it should be.

The post Jamie Jenkins: We seem to be at a crossroads on retirement saving appeared first on Corporate Adviser.

TweetShareShare
Previous Post

Master trust & GPP round table: The cost of a low-price DC mindset

Next Post

Sharon Bellingham: Will pension savings weather the cost of living storm?

Category

  • By Provider
  • News
  • Not for search
  • Provider page archive
  • Uncategorized
  • video
CAPA data

© 2019-2024 Definite Article Media Limited. Design by 71 Media Limited.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication

Follow us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptReject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication