capaDATA
  • PERFORMANCE
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 5-year annualised returns
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 3-year annualised returns
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 1-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 5-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 3-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 1-year annualised returns
  • RISK/RETURN
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 5-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 3-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 1-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 5-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 3-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 1-year annualised
  • PROVIDERS
    • Aegon Master Trust
    • Aon Master Trust
    • Atlas Master Trust
    • Aviva Master Trust
    • The Bluesky Pension Scheme
    • Ensign Retirement Plan
    • Fidelity Master Trust
    • Legal & General Investment Management – WorkSave Pension Mastertrust
    • LifeSight (Willis Towers Watson)
    • Mercer Master Trust
    • National Employment Savings Trust (NEST)
    • Now: Pensions
    • The People’s Pension
    • Salvus Master Trust
    • Scottish Widows Master Trust
    • Smart Pension
    • Standard Life DC Master Trust
    • SuperTrust UK Master Trust
    • TPT Retirement Solutions
    • Welplan Pensions
  • Research
    • ADVISERS
      • Pension provider selection factors
      • Switching
      • Diversification
      • Illiquids
      • ESG
      • Green
      • Digital
      • Consolidation
    • PROVIDERS
      • Master Trusts by number of members
      • Master Trust defaults by assets and number of employers
      • Member charges
      • Employer charges
      • Master trust investment advisers
      • Equity exposure
      • Derisking
      • Asset managers used
  • NEWS
  • MORE
    • About
    • Advertise
    • Contact us
    • Privacy policy
    • Content syndication
    • Terms & Conditions
CAPA
No Result
View All Result

Katharina Lindmeier: Should schemes tackle climate change?

29 September 2020
Katharina Lindmeier: Should schemes tackle climate change?
Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedIn

We’ve often been led to believe that pension scheme members are only interested in the return on their investment, not about how their money is invested.

On the contrary, recent survey data from YouGov*, commissioned by Nest, paints a very different picture of what pension savers care about. Even during the pandemic, when workers’ jobs hang in the balance, people are worried about the impact of climate change on their lives and futures.

  • Four in five adults in the UK believe that climate change must be taken into account on our way to economic recovery from coronavirus.
  • 65% of pension savers believe that their pensions should be invested in a way that tackles climate change.

Through our member surveys, we have discovered that the vast majority of pension scheme members are, after all, interested in how their money is invested. And so they should be. Climate change presents one of the biggest financial, environmental and societal challenges of our times. It is a serious threat to both the quality of pension savers’ lives in retirement as well as their investment returns. Pension schemes that don’t address this in their investment strategies will be exposing their savers’ long-term investment returns to great risks.

This is why, in July 2020 we launched our new Climate Change Policy, in which we laid out our plans to align Nest with the goals of the Paris Agreement. That is, to keep global temperature rises within 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels by reaching net zero global CO2 emissions by 2050 or sooner. In order to meet this goal, we expect to halve carbon emissions in our portfolios by 2030.

If we don’t meet the goals of the Paris Agreement, we could experience catastrophic physical impacts from climate change, such as 48°C heatwaves in London and 40% more floods in cities like York and Leeds by the end of the century.

Our decision to become net-zero has been backed by years of research both within the climate change sector and the financial industry. Consideration of environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks ensures better risk- adjusted returns for any investor.

Supporting companies involved in “green” activities such as renewable energy generation is a great way to start, but it’s not enough. It’s also important to use pension funds’ powers by engaging with companies to encourage them to better their practices and to keep them accountable. Nest’s aim is to actively pressure companies to align with the Paris Agreement goals and to divest from companies when they’re showing little progress in this remit.

Stakeholder engagement has proven to be a successful tool in creating a positive impact. Only a few months back, Nest was one of the supporters of the ShareAction-led shareholder resolution asking Barclays to align its business activities with the goals of the Paris Agreement and attended a meeting with the bank’s Chairman to discuss its approach to climate change. Not long after, Barclays announced their plan to become a net-zero bank by 2050.

This is a great result for all our members and as it turns out, hearing about how their money is invested for good is exactly what most pension savers are interested in.

This means that tackling climate change and other ESG issues is both the right thing to do and could be a great engagement tool as well. Not only for pension funds themselves, but also for employers to communicate to their workers.

Climate change is happening and it’s likely to continue to be one of the most important issues we’re faced with. Pension providers that don’t take this into consideration, don’t only risk savers’ money. They also risk their future. Members want and deserve to know what we’re doing about it.

*All figures, unless otherwise stated, are from YouGov Plc. Total sample size was 2010 UK adults, of which 1,183 who have a pension. Fieldwork was undertaken between 16th – 17th July 2020. The survey was carried out online. The figures have been weighted and are representative of all GB adults (aged 18+).

The post Katharina Lindmeier: Should schemes tackle climate change? appeared first on Corporate Adviser.

TweetShareShare
Previous Post

Wolfgang Seidl: Wellbeing and building back better

Next Post

Royal London bids for LV= – reports

Category

  • By Provider
  • News
  • Not for search
  • Provider page archive
  • Uncategorized
  • video
CAPA data

© 2019-2024 Definite Article Media Limited. Design by 71 Media Limited.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication

Follow us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptReject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication