capaDATA
  • PERFORMANCE
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 5-year annualised returns
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 3-year annualised returns
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 1-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 5-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 3-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 1-year annualised returns
  • RISK/RETURN
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 5-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 3-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 1-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 5-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 3-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 1-year annualised
  • PROVIDERS
    • Aegon Master Trust
    • Aon Master Trust
    • Atlas Master Trust
    • Aviva Master Trust
    • The Bluesky Pension Scheme
    • Ensign Retirement Plan
    • Fidelity Master Trust
    • Legal & General Investment Management – WorkSave Pension Mastertrust
    • LifeSight (Willis Towers Watson)
    • Mercer Master Trust
    • National Employment Savings Trust (NEST)
    • Now: Pensions
    • The People’s Pension
    • Salvus Master Trust
    • Scottish Widows Master Trust
    • Smart Pension
    • Standard Life DC Master Trust
    • SuperTrust UK Master Trust
    • TPT Retirement Solutions
    • Welplan Pensions
  • Research
    • ADVISERS
      • Pension provider selection factors
      • Switching
      • Diversification
      • Illiquids
      • ESG
      • Green
      • Digital
      • Consolidation
    • PROVIDERS
      • Master Trusts by number of members
      • Master Trust defaults by assets and number of employers
      • Member charges
      • Employer charges
      • Master trust investment advisers
      • Equity exposure
      • Derisking
      • Asset managers used
  • NEWS
  • MORE
    • About
    • Advertise
    • Contact us
    • Privacy policy
    • Content syndication
    • Terms & Conditions
CAPA
No Result
View All Result

Simon Lewis: Bridging the ethnicity gap in pensions

21 December 2023
Simon Lewis: Bridging the ethnicity gap in pensions
Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedIn

October’s Black History Month served as a timely reminder to reflect on the complex relationship between ethnicity and pensions. 

While it’s heartening to see increased focus and discussion on this issue, there’s still work to be done inside and outside trustee boardrooms to address the disparities faced by black individuals and those from non-white ethnic backgrounds.

A significant body of data has emerged that highlights the extent of the problem, much of which centres on DC pensions. The latest data from Imperial College London revealed their median ethnicity pay gap has risen slightly, increasing from 8.2 per cent in 2021 and 2022 to 9.5 per cent this year. The same report highlighted their mean ethnicity pay gap had also grown to 15.7 per cent, higher than the 12.3 per cent recorded in 2022, but below the 2021 figure of 17.8 per cent. 

This ethnicity pay gap, with staff from minority ethnic backgrounds being paid less than white staff, is also reflected in pensions. Non-white individuals are likely to receive 24.4 per cent less which means they are £3,350 worse off per year than the average pensioner. For women from ethnic minority backgrounds, the difference is even more stark, with a 51 per cent gap, according to The People’s Pension.

This worrying trend is echoed in a report from LGIM, where the average pension pot for ethnic minorities is less than half the size of their white counterparts, with an average of around £52,000 for ethnic minorities compared to approximately £114,000 for white individuals. The median pot for ethnic minorities is just £13,000. According to the Social Market Foundation, just 25 per cent of ethnic minorities have pension provision in place, compared to the national average of 38 per cent.

As the squeeze on people’s wages continues amid high inflation and increasing interest rates  I fear this pension gap will widen, making it even harder to bridge these differences.

Notably, while the gender pay gap is legally addressed, the ethnicity pay gap is not and this is a key reason behind the lack of comprehensive data. While companies can choose to provide this data voluntarily, there’s currently no formal requirement for disclosure on ethnicity pension pay or gender pension pay. However, the collection of qualitative data is essential for businesses to develop strategies that promote equal pay and work towards narrowing these gaps.

Another barrier is the lack of trust in employers and pensions from individuals from black and non-white backgrounds. Let me explain this scepticism. The issue is complex and relates to several issues including language barriers, lower-paying job roles and a lack of representation or voice from individuals from ethnic backgrounds in boardrooms and in pension scheme literature.

One opportunity for change is auto enrolment which will be extended in April 2024 by age and to start with a lower salary threshold. Could the lowest paid get a bigger boost from employers to create better outcomes at retirement and ensure they join or stay in their pension scheme? This could be major opportunity to help those in the greatest need of retirement support.

Is it also time to acknowledge how pension trustees, employers and the wider industry engage with those most affected by these disparities? Pensions can create fear and confusion in many people, those impacted most by the pensions pay gap are likely to need more direct support to ensure they understand what is being offered and how it is relevant and beneficial for them.

Over my 25-year career in pensions, I’ve probably worked with over 100 pension schemes. I’ve only come across three lay trustees who were people of colour and none of them were female. PWC’s 2022 Trustee Pay report, references ethnic board diversity, with 60 per cent of respondents scoring 0-2 per cent, so my experience is not out of kilter. 

To drive change, having processes that support wider representation would be a good place to start. I’d also reflect I have never worked with a scheme actuary or lead investment consultant who would identify as black in this timeframe.Representation is important.

There’s a great deal more I could write on levelling up and have no doubt that, when more data is obtained, the inequalities will become more pronounced. However, there remains a great deal we can do as employers and trustees to make progress and drive change right now.

The post Simon Lewis: Bridging the ethnicity gap in pensions appeared first on Corporate Adviser.

TweetShareShare
Previous Post

Wellbeing that works

Next Post

Natixis IM appoints new deputy CEO

Category

  • By Provider
  • News
  • Not for search
  • Provider page archive
  • Uncategorized
  • video
CAPA data

© 2019-2024 Definite Article Media Limited. Design by 71 Media Limited.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication

Follow us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptReject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication