capaDATA
  • PERFORMANCE
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 5-year annualised returns
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 3-year annualised returns
    • Younger saver, 30 years to retirement – 1-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 5-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 3-year annualised returns
    • Older saver, 5 years to retirement – 1-year annualised returns
  • RISK/RETURN
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 5-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 3-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Younger saver, 30 years from retirement, 1-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 5-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 3-year annualised
    • Risk/Return – Older saver, 5 years from retirement, 1-year annualised
  • PROVIDERS
    • Aegon Master Trust
    • Aon Master Trust
    • Atlas Master Trust
    • Aviva Master Trust
    • The Bluesky Pension Scheme
    • Ensign Retirement Plan
    • Fidelity Master Trust
    • Legal & General Investment Management – WorkSave Pension Mastertrust
    • LifeSight (Willis Towers Watson)
    • Mercer Master Trust
    • National Employment Savings Trust (NEST)
    • Now: Pensions
    • The People’s Pension
    • Salvus Master Trust
    • Scottish Widows Master Trust
    • Smart Pension
    • Standard Life DC Master Trust
    • SuperTrust UK Master Trust
    • TPT Retirement Solutions
    • Welplan Pensions
  • Research
    • ADVISERS
      • Pension provider selection factors
      • Switching
      • Diversification
      • Illiquids
      • ESG
      • Green
      • Digital
      • Consolidation
    • PROVIDERS
      • Master Trusts by number of members
      • Master Trust defaults by assets and number of employers
      • Member charges
      • Employer charges
      • Master trust investment advisers
      • Equity exposure
      • Derisking
      • Asset managers used
  • NEWS
  • MORE
    • About
    • Advertise
    • Contact us
    • Privacy policy
    • Content syndication
    • Terms & Conditions
CAPA
No Result
View All Result

Younger workers fail to take sufficient risks with pension savings

16 August 2021
New Own Risk Assessment requirement published by TPR
Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedIn

An estimated four million younger workers could be losing out on investment returns because they are in low risk pensions that do not have potential for higher growth.

Research, conducted by Interactive Investor, and backed by findings from LCP, found two thirds of workers aged between 18 and 39 had they have either opted for a low risk (25 per cent) or medium risk (41 per cent) option with their pension. Only 19 per cent say their pension is high risk. 

This equates to almost four million workers nationally. 

Meanwhile the survey found more than half (54 per cent) of workers under 40 think a medium risk pension will product the strongest returns and best retirement outcome, despite evidence that a higher risk portfolio, with more exposure to equities, is likely to deliver superior growth over the longer term. 

This research  found the risk profile of younger workers’ pension investments appears to reflect their risk appetite rather than how many years to retirement they have left, with only 16 per cent of younger workers describing their risk appetite as “high”. In contrast 41 per cent described it as “medium” and 33 per cent said their risk appetite was “low”.

A recent report: ‘Is 12% the new 8%?’, from LCP and Interactive Investor revealed the impact that ‘lower for longer’ investment growth from global stock markets could have on the defined contribution workplace pension pots of today’s younger workers.

The report suggested younger workers would either have to increase their contributions or take other actions, such as increasing the risk level of their pension, to boost their chances of retiring with a decent retirement pot.

LCP partner and head of investment Dan Mikulskis says: “All investment funds are not equal, a higher proportion of your fund held in stocks (or equities) gives a bigger boost to returns prospects over the long term, yet most young workers think that medium risk is the best option for higher returns. 

“This is a failure of communication and young workers could pay a heavy price for it when they retire, in the form of lower retirement incomes.

“Over decades, the difference becomes very large. For example by investing all of your money in equities an average earner would expect to have £46,000 more money at retirement compared to a balanced moderate risk fund. That is equivalent to increasing lifetime contributions from 8 per cent to 12 per cent or working a decade longer.”

Corporate Adviser’s Master Trust and GPP report shows that there is a significant disparity in the equity component of many workplace default funds. 

Becky O’Connor, head of pensions and savings, interactive investor, said: “It’s high time for some serious education around risk and growth in pensions for workers under 40, because at the moment, millions of people who are young enough to take some risk with their investment in return for higher growth are not doing so.

“High risk in this context doesn’t mean crypto trading – it just means a higher proportion of equities. The danger is that people who put themselves in the ‘low risk tolerance’ category choose low risk pension investment mixes in the early days and miss out to the tune of tens of thousands of pounds down the line.”

The post Younger workers fail to take sufficient risks with pension savings appeared first on Corporate Adviser.

TweetShareShare
Previous Post

Stella Beale: Savers need a sensible retirement solution

Next Post

Public support for triple lock falters, particularly among the young

Category

  • By Provider
  • News
  • Not for search
  • Provider page archive
  • Uncategorized
  • video
CAPA data

© 2019-2024 Definite Article Media Limited. Design by 71 Media Limited.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication

Follow us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptReject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Syndication